Case 3307060/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Tartt v Spa Design and Manufacturing Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3307060/2022
- Decision date
- 5 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Tartt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 4 September 2023, the tribunal gave Mr G Tartt an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The respondent was Spa Design and Manufacturing Ltd (in compulsory liquidation).
Mr Tartt did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Warren Date struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying employment claims and no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 4 September 2023, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out; no representations, or no sufficient representations, were made and no hearing was requested. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.