Case 3307064/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs M Harding (2) Mrs W Gunn v Peter Andrews — 2022
- Case reference
- 3307064/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs M Harding (2) Mrs W Gunn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hyams, sitting alone, considered the claims under case numbers 3307064/2020, 3307066/2020 and 3307067/2020. By letter dated 23 March 2022 the tribunal invited the claimants to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out because it appeared that they had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of the claims or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claims in case numbers 3307064/2020, 3307066/2020 and 3307067/2020 after giving the claimants an opportunity by letter dated 23 March 2022 to explain why the claims should not be struck out for apparent non-pursuit. No substantive merits findings were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.