Case 3307098/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307098/2023
- Decision date
- 5 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich on 5 January 2024 before Employment Judge Postle. The claimant, Mr Andrius Majauskas, appeared in person and the respondent, Lynn Star Distribution Logistics Limited, was represented by counsel, Mr McPhail, with a Lithuanian-speaking interpreter present for the claimant.
The only claim identified in the judgment was an unlawful deduction from wages claim. The tribunal's decision is stated in one sentence: the claimant's claim that he suffered unlawful deduction of wages was not well founded. No further findings of fact or legal reasoning are set out in the written record provided.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.