Case 3307111/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A C John v Omnia Lifestyle Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307111/2023
- Decision date
- 15 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A C John
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal ordered the first respondent, Omnia Lifestyle Limited, to pay the claimant £990.30 in accrued holiday pay.
All other claims were dismissed. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested, so the text does not set out findings of fact or legal analysis.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the first respondent must pay the claimant £990.30 accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £990 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all other claims are dismissed; the gov.uk listing identifies unfair dismissal as a claim category. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all other claims are dismissed; the gov.uk listing identifies unlawful deduction from wages as a claim category. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that all other claims are dismissed; the gov.uk listing identifies Working Time Regulations as a claim category. The holiday pay award is recorded separately as holiday_pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £990
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.