Case 3307118/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Masih v Green Home Energy (Private Ltd) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307118/2022
- Decision date
- 1 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Masih
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case listing identifies the proceedings as involving public interest disclosure, unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. In the judgment dated 1 May 2024, the Employment Tribunal recorded that strike out was being considered because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 31 July 2023 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
By letters dated 16 January and 8 April 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out, with deadlines of 30 January 2024 and 15 April 2024. The Tribunal noted that the claimant's email of 17 January 2024 showed receipt of the January warning.
The Tribunal found there was no further reply to the January warning and no other correspondence after that. Because the claimant did not make representations in writing and did not ask for a hearing, the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment strikes out 'the claim' under rule 37 and does not separately analyse the underlying causes of action; claim type taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out 'the claim' under rule 37 and does not separately analyse the underlying causes of action; claim type taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out 'the claim' under rule 37 and does not separately analyse the underlying causes of action; claim type taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.