Case 3307135/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Halliburton v Mortimer & Co Limited T/A Bluebird Care — 2019
- Case reference
- 3307135/2018
- Decision date
- 17 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Halliburton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge R Lewis issued a Rule 21 judgment on 3 December 2019. The written record states that the claim was struck out because the claimant had not given the Tribunal reasons to the contrary in accordance with paragraph 2 of the Order of 2 May 2019.
No remedy was awarded. The supplied text does not set out any substantive liability findings, and it does not distinguish between the pleaded disability discrimination and unlawful deduction from wages categories beyond the strike-out order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out' under Rule 21 because the claimant did not give the Tribunal reasons to the contrary following the Order of 2 May 2019; it does not separately analyse this pleaded category. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out' under Rule 21 because the claimant did not give the Tribunal reasons to the contrary following the Order of 2 May 2019; it does not separately analyse this pleaded category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.