Case 3307156/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Weller v Heath Electrical Services MK Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3307156/2023
- Decision date
- 12 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Weller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Norwich hearing on 12 September 2025, neither party attended. Employment Judge Gordon Walker sat alone and, after reviewing the available material and making enquiries by telephone and email about the non-attendance, disposed of the case under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024.
The claimant's claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract were dismissed. The respondent's breach of contract claim, described as the employer's contract claim, was also dismissed. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claimant's breach of contract claim dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Respondent's breach of contract claim (the employer's contract claim) dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.