Case 3307189/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v KH2A Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307189/2022
- Decision date
- 12 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Ord Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent as a Civil Structural Engineer from 7 to 22 March 2022. He brought claims for outstanding wages, notice pay and unspecified other payments after Early Conciliation and presentation of his claim form.
The tribunal found that the claimant was paid at £20,000 per annum, equivalent to £384.62 per week, and had not been paid for any period of his employment or for his contractual one-week notice period. It awarded £923.09 for unlawful deductions from wages and £384.62 for notice pay in breach of contract.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had conducted the proceedings unreasonably by failing to participate, ignoring tribunal correspondence, not submitting a response and failing to attend two hearings. It awarded £300 by way of a Preparation Time Order, making the total sum due £1,607.71.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unpaid wages for 2.4 weeks of employment. | Upheld | — | £923 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found non-payment of one week's contractual notice pay. | Upheld | — | £385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,608
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.