Case 3307189/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Smith v CJC Utilities Limited (in liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3307189/2023
- Decision date
- 25 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Alliott. The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract and ordered the respondent, CJC Utilities Limited (in liquidation), to pay gross damages of £576.92, subject to tax and NI.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had been in breach of contract by not paying the claimant for 4 days, from 28 March 2023 to 31 March 2023, and ordered payment of a further gross sum of £461.53, subject to tax and NI. No separate findings on other claims or remedies are set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awards gross damages of £576.92, subject to tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £577 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent was in breach of contract in not paying the claimant for 4 days, 28th to 31st March 2023, and awards gross damages of £461.53, subject to tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,038
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.