Case 3307197/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kawasar Zaman (C) For the v Massive Analytic Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3307197/2022
- Decision date
- 11 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kawasar Zaman (C) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading on 11 January 2023 before Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby, with no appearance for the respondent. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim for deductions of wages was well founded. It awarded £55,084.34 gross as set out in the claimant's schedule of loss, together with £2,500 compensation for the additional tax the claimant would have to pay once the sums were received.
The tribunal also found that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to contribute to the claimant's pension. It awarded £487.47 on that claim, again as set out in the claimant's schedule of loss.
In addition, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a contribution to the claimant's costs of £6,720 by 25 January 2023. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for deductions of wages well founded and awarded £55,084.34 gross, together with £2,500 compensation for the additional tax the claimant would have to pay once the sums were received. The tribunal also noted the claimant may need to account for tax and NI on the sum. | Upheld | — | £57,584 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to contribute to the claimant's pension and awarded £487.47 as set out in the claimant's schedule of loss. | Upheld | — | £487 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £64,792
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.