Case 3307237/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Redington v Menu Fresh Limited in Liquidation — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307237/2023
- Decision date
- 16 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Milner-Moore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Redington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 16 September 2024, Employment Judge Milner-Moore recorded that the claimant's complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded. The tribunal ordered the respondent, Menu Fresh Limited in liquidation, to pay damages for that breach, and the written record states that the sum was calculated using gross pay because of the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The tribunal also determined under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £571. The judgment does not record any other claims or any reduction to that entitlement. Taken together, the written decision awards £5,822.00 for notice pay and £571 for redundancy pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment text reads '£5.822.00'; this appears to be an OCR/formatting error and is treated as £5,822.00. | Upheld | — | £5,822 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £571 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,393
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.