Case 3307367/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Dabrell v Kevin George — 2021
- Case reference
- 3307367/2020
- Decision date
- 26 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Dabrell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 27 March 2021, the Tribunal gave Mr M Dabrell an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out. The Tribunal recorded that this opportunity arose because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 26 February 2021 and because the matter had not been actively pursued.
Mr Dabrell did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto struck out the claim under rule 37. The extracted judgment contains no findings on the underlying merits and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause(s) of action in the extracted text. It records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with an order and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.