Case 3307372/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Martin, Solicitor For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3307372/2018
- Decision date
- 9 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henry Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Martin, Solicitor For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter on 8 and 9 July 2019 before Employment Judge Henry. It dealt with two dismissal-related allegations under the Employment Rights Act 1996: that the claimant's employment was terminated because he had asserted a statutory right under section 104, and that it was terminated because he had brought to the respondent's attention, by reasonable means, circumstances connected with his work which he reasonably believed were harmful or potentially harmful to health or safety within section 100(1)(c)(ii).\n\nThe tribunal found that the claimant's employment was not terminated for the principal reason of asserting a statutory right. It also found that the claimant's employment was not terminated for the reason or principal reason that he had raised the health and safety matter relied on under section 100(1)(c)(ii). Those claims were therefore dismissed.\n\nThe claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim was withdrawn after the respondent satisfied that claim. As a result, the written judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed overall, with no separate monetary award recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant's employment was not terminated for the principal reason of asserting a statutory right under section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant's employment was not terminated for the reason or principal reason that he had raised health and safety concerns within section 100(1)(c)(ii) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim was withdrawn after the respondent satisfied that claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 100(1)(c)(ii) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.