Case 3307383/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Leroy Smith v Ultra Voice (a charity) — 2019
- Case reference
- 3307383/2018
- Decision date
- 12 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms K Khawaja, Ms V Blake
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Leroy Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Leroy Smith brought complaints against Ultra Voice (a charity) in case 3307383/2018. The judgment records that the tribunal sat at London South on 11 and 12 November 2019 before Employment Judge Fowell, with Ms K Khawaja and Ms V Blake, and that the claimant appeared in person while the respondent was represented by Mr K Wilson of Hogan Lovells International LLP.
The only operative outcome stated in the extracted judgment is that the tribunal unanimously dismissed all complaints. No separate reasoning, liability findings, or remedy assessment is set out in the extracted text, and no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The extracted judgment text states only that all complaints were dismissed. The case listing identifies this as a public interest disclosure matter. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The extracted judgment text states only that all complaints were dismissed. The case listing identifies religion or belief discrimination as one of the listed categories. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.