Case 3307407/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Yearwood v Department of Work and Pensions — 2020
- Case reference
- 3307407/2018
- Decision date
- 24 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Yearwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerned a preliminary issue: whether the claimant was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. The claimant relied on depression and work-related stress, described in submissions as underlying clinical depression exacerbated by work-related stress. The respondent disputed that she had established a relevant impairment, a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities, or a long-term impairment.
The tribunal found that the claimant had shown a mental impairment in the form of work-related stress, supported by her account and references in her medical records. It was not satisfied that the evidence established a constant underlying medical condition of depression. The tribunal noted difficulties in the way the claimant's evidence described symptoms rather than clearly identifying affected day-to-day activities.
The tribunal was satisfied that during periods when the claimant was unfit for work because of work-related stress, the effect of the impairment was substantial. Although the effects were not constant, the tribunal found that the substantial adverse effect had recurred: there were periods of work-related stress-related absence in 2010, from about November 2013, and from around September 2017 until January 2018. It concluded that from about November 2013 the claimant was a disabled person.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal determined that the claimant was a disabled person from about November 2013. The substantive disability discrimination claim was not determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- section 212(1) Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Part 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- Equality Act 2010 Guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.