Case 3307453/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N King v Clean Secure Watch Facilities — 2020
- Case reference
- 3307453/2020
- Decision date
- 16 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N King
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the Respondent did not present a response to the claim, so judgment was entered for the Claimant under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment identifies the claim as one for unpaid wages.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant was owed wages and awarded her £750 in compensation. The Respondent was ordered to pay that sum to the Claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records an award for 'Unpaid Wages' under Rule 21 after the Respondent failed to present a response to the claim. | Upheld | — | £750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £750
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £750
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.