Case 3307458/2023 · Employment Tribunal
MISS C TURNBULL First v JUNGS Ltd Second Respondent: H.P. JUNG (BEACONSFIELD) LIMITED — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307458/2023
- Decision date
- 30 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan Representatives
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MISS C TURNBULL First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued after no attendance for the respondent. Employment Judge Skehan found that Miss C Turnbull's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded and successful.
The tribunal ordered the first respondent and/or the second respondent to pay £2,217.62 within 14 days. The sum was said to relate to unpaid wages for the period 28 March 2023 to 28 April 2023, calculated as 22 days at 9 hours per day at £11.20 per hour. The judgment states that the amount is gross and should be paid subject to statutory tax and national insurance deductions. H.P. Jung (Beaconsfield) Limited was added as the second respondent during the hearing as the likely full name of the claimant's employer.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded and ordered payment on a joint basis by the first respondent and/or the second respondent. | Upheld | — | £2,218 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,218
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,218
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.