Case 3307460/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Sinclair v Cargiant — 2026
- Case reference
- 3307460/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Sinclair
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 16.05.2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 01.12.2020 and/or had not actively pursued the claim. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing in response.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not set out any substantive liability findings on the pleaded employment issues, and it records no award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 16.05.2021. The underlying pleaded claim type is taken from the case context and listing categories rather than being stated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 16.05.2021. The underlying pleaded claim type is taken from the case context and listing categories rather than being stated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 16.05.2021. The underlying pleaded claim type is taken from the case context and listing categories rather than being stated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.