Case 3307463/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Funnel-Jones 3307463/2023 Ms S Corteil 3307464/2023 Mr M Cassim 3307465/2023 Mr T Flynn 3307466/2023 Mr A Stevenson 3307467/2023 v Mark O’Brian — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307463/2023
- Decision date
- 9 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Funnel-Jones 3307463/2023 Ms S Corteil 3307464/2023 Mr M Cassim 3307465/2023 Mr T Flynn 3307466/2023 Mr A Stevenson 3307467/2023
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letters dated 30 May 2024, the Tribunal gave each claimant until 13 June 2024 to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claimants had not complied with the Tribunal’s order dated 28 February 2024 and that the claims had not been actively pursued.
No claimant made written representations and none requested a hearing. The judgment therefore states that each claim was struck out under rule 37. No remedy or compensation was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment only records that all claims were struck out under rule 37; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment only records that all claims were struck out under rule 37; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment only records that all claims were struck out under rule 37; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The extracted judgment only records that all claims were struck out under rule 37; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.