Case 3307489/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v Cosign traffic Systems Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3307489/2018
- Decision date
- 30 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 30 August 2019, Employment Judge Alliott recorded that Mr D Ingram had been dismissed by reason of redundancy on 28 February 2018 after 13 years' employment with Cosign Traffic Systems Limited. The tribunal found him entitled to a statutory redundancy payment and calculated that award by reference to a weekly pay figure of £423.08 and a redundancy multiplier of 17, producing a redundancy payment of £7,192.36.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice pay and awarded damages in the net sum of £4,269.12. In addition, it found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered payment of £338.46 gross. The written record notes that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no separate written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,192.36. | Upheld | — | £7,192 |
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the respondent dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice pay and awarded net damages of £4,269.12. | Upheld | — | £4,269 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £338.46 gross. | Upheld | — | £338 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,800
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.