Case 3307489/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Lorraine Whalley, lay representative — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307489/2023
- Decision date
- 18 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Watford via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that the hearing took place at Watford via CVP on 17 December 2024 before Employment Judge de Silva KC, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Second Respondent represented by Lorraine Whalley, a lay representative. The record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment.
In the operative decision, the Claimant's claims against the Second Respondent for notice pay and holiday pay were dismissed on withdrawal. The Claimant's claim against the Second Respondent for a redundancy payment was dismissed. The written record contains no further factual findings or remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The Claimant's claim against the Second Respondent for notice pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The Claimant's claim against the Second Respondent for holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The Claimant's claim against the Second Respondent for a redundancy payment was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.