Case 3307545/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Legister v Ramesh Mahendran — 2023
- Case reference
- 3307545/2023
- Decision date
- 17 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Legister
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFor claim number 3307545/2023, Employment Judge Quill Date recorded that an order had been made under Rule 27(1) on 7 September 2023. A notice sent to the parties on 17 November 2023 said the claim appeared to have been one that should have been rejected under Rule 12, invited the claimant to comment, and stated that the claim would stand dismissed if no response was received.
No reply was received from the claimant. The judge then gave until 1 February 2024 for a response, and when none was received the claim was treated as dismissed, without further order, on 1 February 2024 under Rule 27(2). The judgment of 20 March 2024 confirms that all complaints in claim number 3307545/2023 stand dismissed with effect from that date.
For claim number 3308964/2023, the tribunal wrote on 18 January 2024 giving the claimant until 1 February 2024 to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make written representations and did not ask for a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out all complaints under claim number 3308964/2023. The judgment records no monetary award and no merits determination of the underlying complaints in either claim number.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | All complaints under claim number 3307545/2023 were dismissed with effect from 1 February 2024 under Rule 27(2) after no response was received to the Rule 27(1) notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | All complaints under claim number 3308964/2023 were struck out after the claimant failed to make written representations or request a hearing by 1 February 2024 in response to the Rule 37 warning. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 27(1)
- Rule 27(2)
- Rule 12
- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.