Case 3307554/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Q Hawkins v Reed In Partnership Recruitment Team — 2021
- Case reference
- 3307554/2020
- Decision date
- 22 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Q Hawkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 20 January 2021, the Tribunal gave Mr Q Hawkins an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and that it did not disclose a complaint that the Employment Tribunal may determine as being known to the law.
Mr Hawkins did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Regional Employment Judge Foxwell struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive findings on the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action beyond referring to 'the claim'. It was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.