Case 3307555/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Jones (Lay Representative) For the v Ms C Nicolaou (Solicitor) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3307555/2020
- Decision date
- 9 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Jones (Lay Representative) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D Hayward, brought claims against ALN Garages Limited that were listed under unlawful deduction from wages. Employment Judge Fredericks heard the case at Bury St Edmunds via CVP on 9 December 2022, with Miss S Jones appearing for the claimant and Ms C Nicolaou for the respondent.
The tribunal dismissed the claims on limitation grounds. It found that they had been presented out of time, and that time should not be extended because it was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been brought within time. On that basis, the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims.
The judgment records that full reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested in writing within 14 days of the sending of the judgment. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claims were presented out of time. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been brought in time, so time was not extended and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear them. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.