Case 3307562/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Tuggey v And BFS Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3307562/2018
- Decision date
- 20 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Tuggey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the complaint of indirect age discrimination because the claimant failed to pay the £200 deposit that had been ordered following a preliminary hearing held on 7 February 2019. The order was sent to the claimant on 20 February 2019, but the deposit was not paid.
The judgment records that the strike-out was made under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It also states that the complaints of unfair dismissal and direct age discrimination were not affected by this decision, so they were not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The complaint was struck out because the claimant did not pay the £200 deposit ordered after the preliminary hearing on 7 February 2019. The order was sent on 20 February 2019. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.