Case 3307576/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Bryony Sheridan-Kellett v DJK Architecture Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307576/2023
- Decision date
- 6 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms Bryony Sheridan-Kellett
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Reading by CVP on 6 June 2024 before Employment Judge A.M.S. Green, with both parties appearing in person. The written judgment records only that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The record does not contain any substantive findings on liability, any assessment of evidence, or any monetary remedy. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The written judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal; it does not set out separate findings on this individual head of claim. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal; it does not set out separate findings on this individual head of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal; it does not set out separate findings on this individual head of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.