Case 3307586/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Williamson v ABM Accountants Reading Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3307586/2020
- Decision date
- 23 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Milner-Moore
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss N Williamson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 23 March 2022, the Tribunal gave the respondents an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the response should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the respondents had not complied with the orders made on 12 November 2021 and that the matter had not been actively pursued by the respondents.
The respondents did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the response filed on behalf of both respondents. This judgment records a procedural strike-out only and does not decide the substantive employment claims.
The Tribunal also recorded that the respondents would remain entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. The judgment was dated 21 June 2022 and sent to the parties on 10 July 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine any substantive claim. It records that the response filed on behalf of both respondents was struck out because the respondents had not complied with the orders made on 12 November 2021 and had not actively pursued the matter. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.