Case 3307602/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R St Leger v Cell Therapy Catapult Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3307602/2020
- Decision date
- 24 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R St Leger
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that, by letter dated 28 March 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated basis was that the claim had not been actively pursued and that the claimant had failed to respond to the Tribunal's letter of 28 March 2022.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Laidler struck out the claim on 24 May 2022. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying complaint or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action; it records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued and for failure to respond to the Tribunal's letter dated 28 March 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.