Case 3307672/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Brian David Pickering v Total Home Delivery Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3307672/2025
- Decision date
- 9 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Brian David Pickering
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response to the claim after the claim form was sent in accordance with rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024. The claimant provided further information by correspondence, and the Tribunal determined that the claims could properly be decided under rule 22.
The Tribunal found the unauthorised deductions from wages claim well founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant GBP 1,597.48 net. It also found the breach of contract claim for notice pay well founded, noting that the claimant's statutory notice period was one week and that the claimant was not paid for that period, and ordered payment of GBP 798.47 net.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the claim as unauthorised deductions from wages under Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13 and states it is well founded. | Upheld | — | £1,597 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes the claim as breach of contract for notice pay and states it is well founded. | Upheld | — | £798 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,396
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.