Case 3307749/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Pells v Sharpe Cleaners — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307749/2023
- Decision date
- 19 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Pells
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 21 May 2024, Employment Judge Quill gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal order dated 25 February 2024 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The judgment dated 10 September 2024 states that the claim is struck out. No substantive determination of the underlying employment claims is recorded in the judgment, and no compensation or other remedy is awarded.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 19 November 2024. The extracted text does not identify any lay members, legal tests, or further findings beyond the strike-out reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type(s). It records that the whole claim was struck out after the claimant had been given an opportunity by letter dated 21 May 2024 to make representations or request a hearing because she had not complied with the tribunal order dated 25 February 2024 and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.