Case 3307760/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Dolzhykov v Signorellis Deli Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3307760/2024
- Decision date
- 6 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Dolzhykov
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 31 July 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that the claim, or part of it, could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,679.93 gross. It also upheld the claim that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £680.00 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £492.58. The judgment records a total sum payable of £2,852.51.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £680 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £493 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,853
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.