Case 3307793/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Naeco Ltd (In voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307793/2023
- Decision date
- 10 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anderson, sitting alone at Watford Employment Tribunal by CVP on 22 July 2024, heard the claimant's unauthorised deduction from wages claim. The claimant attended in person; the respondent, which is in voluntary liquidation, did not attend, although the liquidators had been notified of the hearing date. The judge proceeded on the basis of the claimant's oral evidence, which the judge described as detailed and cogent and had no reason to doubt.
The claimant's evidence, supported by HMRC records she had accessed through other self-employed work, was that the respondent had reported paying her £1,384.98 net for March 2023 and the same amount for April 2023, but she had in fact only received £500. Her annual wage was £40,000 pro rata, working half time (equivalent to £20,000). She gave two weeks' notice in April 2023 after the underpayment, with her last day of employment being 18 April 2023, and received no response to requests for payment of wages and holiday pay.
On the basis of that uncontested evidence, the tribunal found that the respondent had, in breach of s13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996, unlawfully deducted £2,269.96 from the claimant's wages for March and April 2023, and a further £450.50 in respect of 2.6 days accrued but untaken holiday at £173.12 per day net. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £2,720.46 net within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages for March and April 2023 under s13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996; sum of £2269.96 (net wages less £500 already paid). | Upheld | — | £2,270 |
| Holiday pay | Unlawful deduction in respect of 2.6 days accrued but untaken holiday at £173.12 per day net (£450.50). Judgment summarises this as part of the deduction from wages claim. | Upheld | — | £451 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,720
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.