Case 3307806/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Bodi v Bernard Matthews Foods Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3307806/2020
- Decision date
- 21 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Bodi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Miss E Bodi's Equality Act claim based on pregnancy and her claim for unlawful deduction of wages under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment states that the claims were dismissed because the claimant did not respond to the tribunal's order of 24 February 2021 and the claims were therefore no longer actively pursued.
No liability findings or remedy assessment were made. The judgment is a short Rule 21 dismissal issued by Employment Judge Postle on 19 April 2021 and sent to the parties on 21 April 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 21 after the claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's order of 24 February 2021 and the claim was treated as no longer actively pursued. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 21 after the claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's order of 24 February 2021 and the claim was treated as no longer actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.