Case 3307826/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Katarzyna Burdzyluk v Brian G Lonis (Services) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3307826/2020
- Decision date
- 16 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mrs M Castro, Mr R Clifton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Katarzyna Burdzyluk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford on 13-15 June 2022, before Employment Judge Bedeau with Mrs M Castro and Mr R Clifton, held that the claimant's section 99 Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissal claim was well-founded. The respondent, Brian G Lonis (Services) Ltd, was ordered to pay the claimant £1,872.92 in compensation for unfair dismissal.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's indirect sex discrimination claim under section 19 Equality Act 2010 was not well-founded and dismissed it. The written record does not set out the tribunal's full reasoning, because it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, the record stating that the respondent had paid her in full. The tribunal further recorded that the recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Section 99 Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissal claim found well-founded; compensation ordered in the sum of £1,872.92. | Upheld | — | £1,873 |
| Sex discrimination | Indirect sex discrimination claim under section 19 Equality Act 2010 found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant after the respondent had paid her in full. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,873
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,873
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.19 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.