Case 3307841/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Mikalkyavichene v Ms Julie Mackey v — 2022
- Case reference
- 3307841/2020
- Decision date
- 4 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Mikalkyavichene
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading by CVP on 4 April 2022 before Employment Judge Hawksworth sitting alone. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so the judgment itself records the orders rather than a detailed written explanation.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's back pay claim and ordered the respondent to pay £80.00, described as two days' pay in March 2020. It also upheld the claim for notice pay and ordered payment of £120.00 in respect of notice.
The claim for pay during furlough was dismissed. The judgment does not record any separate award for that head of claim, and the total sum ordered to be paid was £200.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £80 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £120 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment labels this head as pay during furlough and dismisses it; the written record does not set out a fuller legal basis. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.