Case 3307885/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G. Abbott, lay representative For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3307885/2020
- Decision date
- 8 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
- Panel members
- Mrs A. Brosnan, Mr I. Bone
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms G. Abbott, lay representative For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford by CVP on 8 July 2021 before Employment Judge McNeill QC with lay members Mrs A. Brosnan and Mr I. Bone. The claimant was represented by Ms G. Abbott and the respondent by Mr B. Uduje, Counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim for direct race discrimination. The written decision records only the outcome and does not set out the tribunal's reasons, because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The published record also states that written reasons would not be provided unless either party requested them within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for direct race discrimination was dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.