Case 3307907/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Cool v Oxford Aviation Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3307907/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Cool
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto recorded that Mrs K Cool’s complaints of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal succeed against Oxford Aviation Services Limited. The judgment does not set out findings of fact or any reasoned analysis beyond the fact that the complaints were upheld.
The judgment states that the case will be listed for a remedy hearing to consider what remedy the claimant is entitled to receive. No monetary award is recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment states the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal succeeds. The judgment does not record a remedy amount and lists the case for a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Rule 21 judgment states the claimant’s complaint of wrongful dismissal succeeds. The judgment does not record a remedy amount and lists the case for a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.