Case 3307954/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Szablinski Mr K Mazur v Green 2 Delivery Ltd (In Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3307954/2023
- Decision date
- 18 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Szablinski Mr K Mazur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Green 2 Delivery Ltd was in administration and that neither the consent of the administrator nor permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to continue, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. It also noted that on 23 April 2025 the claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued, but no acceptable reason was provided.
The judgment therefore struck out the claim. No merits findings or monetary award are recorded in the extracted text. The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separate the two case numbers, so the substantive claim types are taken from the tribunal listing categories.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out and does not separate the two case numbers; this claim type is taken from the tribunal listing categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out and does not separate the two case numbers; this claim type is taken from the tribunal listing categories. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.