Case 3308068/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Emily Bamber, Crown Advocate for the States of Guernsey PRELIMINARY HEARING IN PUBLIC — 2024
- Case reference
- 3308068/2023
- Decision date
- 12 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in public on 22 February 2024, Employment Judge Tynan amended the respondent’s name to The States of Guernsey. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Emily Bamber, Crown Advocate. The judgment records that the case was heard by CVP in Cambridge and that the written decision was sent to the parties on 12 March 2024.
The Tribunal dismissed the claim because the claimant was not entitled to bring it before the Employment Tribunal. The reason given was that the Tribunal had no territorial jurisdiction to answer the claimant’s complaint. The written judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying complaint.
No remedy was awarded, and the judgment does not set out any compensation or other monetary award. The decision is therefore a jurisdictional dismissal only, with the substantive complaint left undecided in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment does not identify the substantive legal basis of the complaint. At a preliminary hearing, the Tribunal dismissed the claim because it had no territorial jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.