Case 3308131/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Plummer v Lifeways Community Care Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3308131/2023
- Decision date
- 26 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Plummer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent had reasonable and proper cause to investigate concerns about medication communication and to move the claimant temporarily while an investigation was undertaken. However, it found the respondent took no steps to progress or conclude that investigation, did not properly consider the suitability of the proposed alternative workplace given the claimant's inability to work 1:1 shifts, and did not review or resolve the position when responsibility for the relevant service user transferred away from the respondent.
The tribunal also found that, following the claimant's assault at work, the respondent unreasonably failed to complete required internal debrief documentation and unreasonably failed to consider discretionary company sick pay under its internal policies. The respondent's failure to provide welfare contact was not in isolation enough to destroy trust and confidence, but formed part of the cumulative pattern found by the tribunal.
The proposed TUPE transfer increased the consequences of the unresolved investigation because the claimant believed the investigation and relevant background would pass to a new provider without adequate context. The tribunal found the respondent's failures were likely to destroy or seriously damage trust and confidence, that the claimant had not affirmed the contract, and that she resigned at least in part in response to those breaches. The unfair dismissal claim therefore succeeded. The sick pay claim failed because company sick pay was discretionary and not contractually payable.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant had been constructively dismissed and, as the respondent did not seek to argue any potentially fair reason if dismissal was found, concluded the dismissal was unfair. Remedy was reserved for a separate hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned non-payment of discretionary company sick pay. The tribunal found company sick pay was not contractually payable and therefore could not conclude it was properly payable as wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was advanced together with the unauthorised deduction claim in respect of company sick pay and was dismissed because the claimant had no contractual entitlement to that discretionary sick pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- implied term of mutual trust and confidence
- s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.