Case 3308207/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Santos v The Algarve Restaurant Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3308207/2023
- Decision date
- 9 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Santos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr B Santos against The Algarve Restaurant Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages, had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice, had dismissed him by reason of redundancy, and had failed to pay his holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered payment of £900.00 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages, £1,350.00 for breach of contract notice pay, £1,350.00 as a redundancy payment, and £513.00 for unpaid holiday entitlement. The judgment records no reduction, offset, or additional interest award, and the total monetary award on the face of the judgment is £4,113.00.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £900.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £900 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,350.00 damages. | Upheld | — | £1,350 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £1,350.00. | Upheld | — | £1,350 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £513.00. | Upheld | — | £513 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,113
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.