Case 3308242/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr p morrison v Dataqube Global Ltd (Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3308242/2023
- Decision date
- 11 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge ORD Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr p morrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. On that basis, the Employment Judge determined the claim, or part of it, without a contested hearing and entered judgment for the claimant, Mr P Morrison, against Dataqube Global Ltd (Liquidation).
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and awarded £16,148.00 net. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,384.61. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and awarded £3,353.42. The total sum payable was £20,886.03.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £16,148 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,385 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,353 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,886
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.