Case 3308648/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Lee v Standon Calling Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3308648/2024
- Decision date
- 13 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Lee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Dick heard the case at Watford by CVP on 22 September 2025. The tribunal held under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that Mr R Lee was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,144, described as eight weeks' pay subject to the applicable statutory cap, and ordered the respondent to pay that sum by 13 October 2025.
The tribunal dismissed the remainder of the complaints because they were not presented within the applicable time limit. It found that it was reasonably practicable to do so. The short judgment did not set out any separate remedy allocation beyond the redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal determined that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,144, being eight weeks' pay subject to the applicable statutory cap. | Upheld | — | £5,144 |
| Other | The remainder of the complaints comprising the claim were dismissed because they were not presented within the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,144
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.163 ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.