Mr S B A Shah v LHR Airports Limited — 2025

Case reference: 3308696/2024
Decision date: 27 October 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge George Representation
Venue: Reading

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr S B A Shah

Respondent

LHR Airports Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew the complaint of breach of contract in respect of failure to pay overtime. That complaint was dismissed following withdrawal.

The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim and the wrongful dismissal claim were not well founded and dismissed both claims. The judgment states that this disposed of the entire claim. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The complaint of breach of contract in respect of failure to pay overtime was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal stated that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it.	Dismissed	—	—
Wrongful dismissal	The tribunal stated that the wrongful dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.