Case 3308750/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Richardson v DJK & CC Catering Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3308750/2024
- Decision date
- 18 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Richardson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment by Employment Judge Anstis concerning a claim brought by Mr O Richardson against DJK & CC Catering Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,398.75 gross.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £349.19. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, and ordered payment of £574.86.
The judgment was approved on 3 September 2025 and sent to the parties on 18 September 2025. No reasons were set out within the available text beyond the determinations and sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday entitlement; award of £574.86. | Upheld | — | £575 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award of £1,398.75 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,399 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £349.19. | Upheld | — | £349 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,323
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.