Mr C Mazloum v The Dash Charity — 2025

Case reference: 3308768/2024
Decision date: 9 June 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Young

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Mazloum

Respondent

The Dash Charity

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By letter dated 21 March 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr C Mazloum an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the whistleblowing complaint should not be struck out. The Tribunal identified two reasons for possible strike out: non-compliance with the order dated 10 February 2025 and the fact that the complaint had not been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the complaint of whistleblowing. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim(s) remained listed for hearing at 10am on 1 August 2025.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The Tribunal struck out the complaint because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 10 February 2025 and the complaint had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's 21 March 2025 letter.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.