Case 3308808/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Niraula v High Road Hospitality Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3308808/2022
- Decision date
- 31 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Niraula
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment in case 3308808/2022. The Tribunal recorded that the Claimant's unfair dismissal complaint appeared from the claim form to involve employment for under two years, and by letter dated 19 July 2022 he was given an opportunity to explain why that complaint should not be struck out. No response was received.
The Tribunal later sent a further letter dated 7 November 2023 giving the Claimant until 14 November 2023 to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 31 August 2023. The Claimant did not make written representations and did not ask for a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under Rule 37.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under Rule 37. The reasons state that the Claimant did not respond to the letter dated 19 July 2022, which invited him to explain why the complaint should not be struck out because it appeared from the claim form that he had been employed for under two years, and also did not respond to the letter dated 7 November 2023 or request a hearing concerning non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 31 August 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.