Case 3308822/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sheila Foster v Centrebus Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3308822/2022
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Members
- Panel members
- Ms C Carr, Ms B Osborne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sheila Foster
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford ET, sitting by Cloud Video Platform on 8-9 February 2024 before Employment Judge Bedeau with Ms C Carr and Ms B Osborne as members, recorded that the claimant was Ms Sheila Foster and the respondent was Centrebus Ltd. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the judgment itself sets out the dispositive outcomes only.
The tribunal dismissed the claim of constructive unfair dismissal, stating that it was not well-founded. It also dismissed the direct race discrimination claim and the direct sex discrimination claim, each on the basis that they was not well-founded.
The claim of detriment on grounds of union membership or activities was also dismissed as not well-founded. The wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed on the basis that it had not been proved.
No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment. The order was sent to the parties on 4 March 2024, and the judgment notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's notice.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Described in the judgment as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal; dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination claim dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Trade union | Claim of detriment on grounds of union membership or activities dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Wrongful dismissal claim dismissed; the tribunal recorded that it had not been proved. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.