Case 3308830/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Griffith v GPC logistics — 2025
- Case reference
- 3308830/2022
- Decision date
- 4 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Griffith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, on a letter dated 19 July 2024, gave Mr J Griffith an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 19 July 2024 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Griffith did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Cowen struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying wage claim and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim in the extracted text, but the gov.uk listing category for this case is Unlawful Deduction from Wages. The claim was struck out for non-compliance with an order dated 19 July 2024 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.