Case 3308890/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Mahmood v The Chapar Online Styling Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3308890/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Mahmood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Mahmood’s complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was upheld. The respondent, The Chapar Online Styling Limited, did not attend the CVP hearing before Employment Judge Cowen on 18 April 2024.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages for the period 13 March 2023 to 25 March 2023. It held that the sum due was the gross amount of £923.08.
The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that payment. No other claims or remedies were recorded in the written decision, and no written reasons were provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 13 March 2023 to 25 March 2023 and ordered payment of the gross sum owed. | Upheld | — | £923 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £923
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.